Gross Injustice: The Battle in the Supreme Court

In 2005, the Supreme Court ruled in Roper v. Simmons that the death penalty is unconstitutional for juvenile offenders. This landmark decision was the culmination of a long and hard-fought battle by lawyers, activists, and families who had been working to end the practice of executing children.

Gross Injustice: The Battle in the Supreme Court

by Michael Walzer

4.6 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	5712 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	179 pages
Lending	:	Enabled

FREE

The case was brought on behalf of Christopher Simmons, who was sentenced to death in Missouri for killing a woman when he was 17 years old. Simmons's lawyers argued that the death penalty was cruel and unusual punishment for a juvenile offender, and that it violated the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution.

The Supreme Court agreed with Simmons's lawyers. In a 5-4 decision, the Court held that the death penalty is unconstitutional for juvenile offenders because it is "cruel and unusual punishment." The Court found that juveniles are less mature and less culpable than adults, and that they are more likely to be rehabilitated. The Court also found that the death penalty is not a necessary deterrent to juvenile crime.

The Roper decision was a major victory for the anti-death penalty movement. It marked the first time that the Supreme Court had ruled that the death penalty was unconstitutional for a specific class of offenders. The decision has since been cited as precedent in other cases challenging the death penalty for juvenile offenders.

The Roper decision was also a personal victory for Simmons. After spending nearly 10 years on death row, he was resentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. Simmons has since become an advocate for the abolition of the death penalty.

The Roper decision was a landmark victory in the fight against the death penalty. It is a testament to the power of the law to protect the most vulnerable members of our society.

The Arguments Against the Death Penalty for Juvenile Offenders

There are a number of arguments against the death penalty for juvenile offenders. First, juveniles are less mature and less culpable than adults. They are more likely to act impulsively and without thinking about the consequences of their actions. They are also more likely to be influenced by peer pressure and other external factors.

Second, juveniles are more likely to be rehabilitated than adults. They have more time to grow and change, and they are more likely to respond to treatment. The death penalty forecloses the possibility of rehabilitation.

Third, the death penalty is not a necessary deterrent to juvenile crime. Studies have shown that the death penalty does not deter crime any more effectively than other punishments, such as life in prison without the possibility of parole.

Fourth, the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment for juvenile offenders. It is a barbaric practice that has no place in a civilized society.

The Impact of the Roper Decision

The Roper decision has had a significant impact on the use of the death penalty in the United States. Since the decision was handed down, the number of juvenile offenders on death row has declined by more than half. No juvenile offender has been executed in the United States since 2005.

The Roper decision has also been cited as precedent in other cases challenging the death penalty for juvenile offenders. In 2010, the Supreme Court ruled in Graham v. Florida that the death penalty is unconstitutional for offenders who were under 18 years old at the time of their crime, even if the crime was murder.

The Roper and Graham decisions represent a major victory for the anti-death penalty movement. They have helped to ensure that the death penalty is not used against the most vulnerable members of our society.

The Roper decision was a landmark victory in the fight against the death penalty. It is a testament to the power of the law to protect the most vulnerable members of our society. The decision has had a significant impact on the use of the death penalty in the United States, and it has been cited as precedent in other cases challenging the death penalty for juvenile offenders.

The Roper decision is a reminder that the death penalty is a cruel and unusual punishment that has no place in a civilized society. It is a victory for justice and for the protection of children.

Gross Injustice: The Battle in the Supreme Court

by Michael Walzer

4.6 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	5712 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	179 pages
Lending	:	Enabled

FREE